Email to pro1040@home.com

Consulting OnLine ©

Bob Parrish CPA, P.C. HOME (941) 387-0926

 ~ It Is:

    Return to previous page  

*Preface - What This Is
Introduction
Objectives
Your Questions
What You Will Need
Warning
Intro Summary
Related Information

*Plain English Explanation

Object Restated
Why or How It Works
Alternatives
Cost V. Benefit
Other
Reserved


*Tech Analysis & Citations

Commentary
Law
Regs
Cases
Revenue Procedures
Revenue Rulings
Private Letter Rulings

*TAX KILLERS


*COST KILLERS

*PREPARE FOR ADVISER
Entrance Interview

Exit Interview

From Banking Records

From Customer Records

From Signed Documents

From Your Other Business, or Financial Records

From Corporation or Organization Records (meetings, etc.)

What to do


*PREPARE YOURSELF
Action Checklist - What To Do

OVERVIEW OF PROCEDURES



*FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
Financial Statement Presentation
Notes to Financial Statements
How to Make Entries
What Kind of Records to Keep
Bookkeeping Methods - Cash, Accrual and Other
How the Business Entity Affects the Recording

*COMPLIANCE


*ALERTS - DANGERS
Action Checklist
Alerts & Dangers - Risks
Asset Protection
Your Defense

*TOOLS


*SAMPLES


*REQUIRED REPORTS


*CHECKLIST FOR DEPLOYMENT


*CHECKLIST FOR MONITORING


*INDEX


*BOB PARRISH CPA, P.C.

pro1040 and Consulting OnLine are ©
Alert - S Corp Income Taxed Twice

From the U.S. Court of Appalls  (Appeals) (Jump to the Cases)

Preface ~ Client Letter - What this idea is about  ~ Introduction

Dear Client: 

This letter / document alerts you to one of the many appalling treatments of taxpayers and decisions both in the administration (Executive Branch) and in the courts (Judicial Branch).

Related Articles:

  1. S corporation basis and distribution elections

  2. S Corporation Alert - Dbl Taxation

  3. S Corporation - Forming

  4. S Corp and Late Elections

  5. Succession and estate planning for S corporation owners.

  6. S corporation topics

  7. S Corporation

  8. S Corp Scrutiny of Distributions.

  9. Corp Formalities

 

Learning Objectives (What You Asked) ~ Your Questions: The following questions will be answered

If the taxpayer has made an election to be classified as an S Corporation, is there any danger of "Double Taxation"?   Read this you will be appalled!

This Topic OBJECTIVE is or What it Does

Why and  how it works

Alternatives - Comparisons and Contrasts

Cost v. Benefits Analysis - Its Value

What You Will Need  

Nothing

TOP

Engagement Status Letter ~ WARNING!

You have not engaged Bob Parrish CPA PC, Bob Parrish CPA, pro1040, Consulting on line, any related parties, or the ISP to perform any services for you or offer you advice.  This entire site is for educational or informational purposes only.   The materials are not opinions, advise, legal advice on any matter and have not been tailored to specific jurisdictions, individuals, other entities, or circumstances.  You are not to use the forms, concepts, strategies, or knowledge without assistance from a professional.   You must update and validate this information yourself with your own research, experience and the advice of a competent professional adviser in your jurisdiction.  The author, the corporation, the ISP, Bob Parrish CPA, Bob Parrish CPA, P.C. or other parties related to those or this site do not guarantee or warrantee in any manner the suitability, usefulness, accuracy, timeliness, or results of any portions of this site, nor the links contained in this site which link to other areas.   At times, information is taken from other sources and is believed to be accurate, but no verification or confirmation is performed.  Furthermore, if any federal or state law invalidates a portion of this disclaimer, the other portions still apply.   In addition, any allegations or actions are restricted to arbitration only and must be arbitrated by the Better Business Bureau in Sarasota Florida.  Reading of these pages constitutes complete acceptance and agreement with all disclaimer provisions on all pages of this site. ....... Sunday, March 04, 2007 08:48 AM   

Bob Parrish CPA:

Disclaimer for all except securities related articles

 

TOP

Summary

This is an instance where the sole shareholder of an S Corporation was taxed twice on income.  The disaster was created by the IRS disallowing deductions for amounts paid to the shareholder which the shareholder included in income.

Related Information

  1. A few closely related topics & pages From Bob Parrish CPA PC (left-click this to expand it):   

    1. pro1040 Home

    2. Email Bob Parrish CPA PC

    3. S Corp and Dbl Taxation

    4. US Court of Appalls - S Corp Dbl Taxed

TOP

 

Plain English Explanation

Plain English Explanation

Object Restated
Why or How It Works
Alternatives
Cost V. Benefit
Other
Reserved

Your Answers

This Topic OBJECTIVE is: What it does Explanation of this topic and how it may affect you (for how it may affect you also refer to : Financial Accounting: Bookkeeping & Financials ~ Compliance - What is required for protection, defense, etc. ~ Alerts & Dangers)

The taxpayer performed all services in an S Corporation.  Personal property was owned by the taxpayer as an individual.  The personal property was leased to the corporation.  The corporation paid  the leases and deducted the expenses.  The IRS examined the records of the corporation and disallowed the deductions on the corporate tax return.  HOWEVER - the IRS did not question the income side of the transaction on the shareholder's personal tax return.  The taxpayer attempted to remove the income from his personal tax return - the IRS did not agree.  

This placed the taxpayer in a very unfair position.  Since the corporation was an S Corporation, the disallowed deduction increased the shareholder's income on his personal 1040 by the amount of the disallowed deduction.  In addition the income relating to the increased K1 (pass-through) amount was a duplication of the income on his personal 1040.

The taxpayer appealed, went to the United States Tax Court and appealed the adverse decision of the Tax Court to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.  The taxpayer lost.  Regular penalties, interest and the negligence penalty were all applied.

Start of Plain English Section

 

Why or How it works - Both Sides of the Equation and Examples:

The leases were on boats.  Those boats were declared to be entertainment facilities.  The taxpayer did not meet the substantiation requirements.  Thereby the IRS was able to disallow the lease payments made by the corporation.  This then resulted in an increased K1 income passes through to the shareholder.

The taxpayer then argued since the corporation could not deduct the lease payments made to him, he should not be required to include the lease payments in his income.  The result would be the government would charge tax on the very same income twice.  

Start of Plain English Section

Alternatives

Comparisons

 

Contrasts

 

Start of Plain English Section

Cost v. Benefit Analysis ~ Its Value

Start of Plain English Section

Other

Start of Plain English Section

Reserved

Start of Plain English Section

Technical Analysis and Explanation

Tech Analysis & Citations
Commentary
Law
Regs
Cases
Revenue Procedures
Revenue Rulings
Private Letter Rulings
Technical Analysis & Citations 

Commentary

Disallowing the Deductions at the Corporate Level:

The IRS chose to disallow the lease deductions.  The legal counsel for the Executive Branch won the argument by proving the leased items were "Entertainment Facilities" and the  items uses  were entertainment functions.

The legal counsel then applied the law which expressly disallows all deductions fro entertainment facilities.  The government counsel for the Executive Branch then were able to prove the taxpayer did not maintain proper substantiation for the entertainment uses.

Proving That the Double Taxation is Provided For in the Statutes and Common Law:

The lawyers for the Executive Branch then sought to prevent the taxpayer from adjusting his personal tax return by the amount of the disallowed expenses.  Since the entity that lost its tax deduction was a pass-through entity, the sole shareholder was required to increase his income by the amount of the lease expensed on the S Corporation's books (K1).  This amount had already been included on the taxpayer's personal income as lease income on schedule E of his personal form 1040.  Therefore the taxpayer is not staring at paying tax on the lease income and paying tax on the pass-through's income without the deduction of that same lease amount.   The Executive Branch chose to and made a deliberated decision to force the taxpayer to pay tax on this income twice. 

The IRS and its legal counsel carefully crafted this by showing there were two separate and distinct entities - the individual and the S Corporation.  IT proved the audit adjustments of the corporation do not affect the tax return of the individual (except as provided by the pass-through treatment).  The government deliberately and carefully crafted its course to establish the leases were in fact paid by the corporation and were accepted by the individual as lease income.  Those amounts were reported on the individual's income tax return as income - thereby admitting both receipt and acceptance of the payments from the corporation as lease income.

Start of Technical Analysis

Law

The IRS used §274(a)(1)(B) to disallow all the expensed lease payments, because it proved the boats were for entertainment.  This would not seem to be a surprise or unexpected viewpoint or challenge.  I will remind the reader, the unexpected result is that of double taxation.

SECTION 274. DISALLOWANCE OF CERTAIN ENTERTAINMENT, ETC., EXPENSES

(a) ENTERTAINMENT, AMUSEMENT, OR RECREATION

(1) IN GENERAL: No deduction otherwise allowable under this chapter shall be allowed for any item--

(A) ACTIVITY: With respect to an activity which is of a type generally considered to constitute entertainment, amusement, or recreation, unless the taxpayer establishes that the item was directly related to, or, in the case of an item directly preceding or following a substantial and bona fide business discussion (including business meetings at a convention or otherwise), that such item was associated with, the active conduct of the taxpayer's trade or business, or

(B) FACILITY: With respect to a facility used in connection with an activity referred to in subparagraph (A).

In the case of an item described in subparagraph (A), the deduction shall in no event exceed the portion of such item which meets the requirements of subparagraph (A).

Facility: This definition includes yachts, hunting lodges, fishing camps, swimming pools, tennis courts, bowling alleys, automobiles, airplanes, apartments, hotel suites, and homes in vacation resorts. This definition has been held to include the leasing of a ranch for hunting (On Shore Quality Control Specialist, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-95), a hot-air balloon used to entertain customers (Dodd v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-341), and motorboats used for business discussions and to entertain clients.

Substantiation: The tax statutes provide that the taxpayer has the burden of proof for taking tax deductions on entertainment expenses.  The reader can find those rules in the law and the related regulations  at §274.

You will also find related topics in the pro1040 site - for example:

Car - law requirements for recordkeeping

Travel Deductions Recordkeeping

Travel - Entertainment - Gifts

Start of Law Section

Start of Technical Analysis

Regs

Start of Regs Section

Start of Technical Analysis

Cases

 

S Corp and Dbl Taxation (pdf format) This is the first Case in this item and is in the U.S. Tax Court

USTC S Corp Dbl Taxation (MS Word Format)

US Court of Appalls - S Corp Dbl Taxed (pdf format) final case

Start of Cases Section

Start of Technical Analysis

Revenue Procedures

Start of Revenue Procedures Section

Start of Technical Analysis

Revenue Rulings

Start of Revenue Rulings

Start of Technical Analysis

Private Letter Rulings

Start of Private Letter Rulings

Start of Technical Analysis

TOP

Tax Killers  

TAX KILLERS

This is about Activity Based Taxplanning - maximizing deductions, minimizing cash outlay and maximizing the amount of cash retained and the net worth.  Activity Based Taxplanning (ABT) is a methodology developed by Bob Parrish CPA, that assists people with the tax issues by focusing on the activity (or actions - events) that are being undertaken or contemplated (or have already taken place).  The,  research is compiled from the myriad of sources to help you complete the activity with the least tax cost, while maintaining compliance the tax laws, other laws and regulations and place yourself in a position to protect your objectives.

Tax is a subject that many view in order to cut costs.  Taxes are a cost just as any other cost.  It happens this cost is somewhat intangible and is defined by legislation without a tangible item to view and control.  The money is spent and the control of the expenditure is more appropriately administered by someone trained in the law.

In order to prevent this from happening to you  - you must "second guess" the IRS personnel, the IRS legal counsel and the judges of the courts.  Therefore, the risk is quite high the opposition will be successful somewhere in the chain of events.  However, there are some actions and planning available to you for your defense.

  1. Do not claim any expense for a "facility"

  2. Meet the requirements for substantiation

  3. Place "hemlock clauses" in the corporation Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws and minutes of meetings. 

Hemlock Clauses - This is a statement in the Articles, the Bylaws and Minutes that will attempt to at least diminish and in some instances mitigate an attempt to charge you twice for taxes on income.

It is in my opinion important to place these clauses in the Articles because the Articles are on file with the state in which the corporation filed the Articles and thereby places the public on notice since the Articles are open to public inspection.

It is important to place them in the bylaws for the obvious reason this is a governing instrument of the corporation.

It is important to place them in the minutes showing acceptance and agreement of the officers.

The drafting of these clauses will need to anticipate the following possibilities:

  1. Deductions at the corporate level will be disallowed

  2. Income at the corporate level will be increased

  3. Deductions at the shareholder or employee level will be disallowed

  4. Income at the shareholder or employee level will be increased

This list is not intended to be exhaustive.  There probably will be additional considerations in your circumstances.

If the agreement between the corporation and the recipient, and the Articles are constructed so that the payments are "contingent" upon future events or the non-occurrence of future events, and/or require return of income or reimbursements then a possibility is made the "double taxation" can be reduced - but may require the realization in multiple tax years.

If the shareholder/employee is reimbursed for a corporate expense and this is disallowed then the requirement would be the reimbursement must be returned to the corporation.  It is advised this be structured like the "Accountable Plan" rules and the time period for the return of the reimbursement be as similar as plausible given the fact the IRS may not make a challenge for several years.  

If the shareholder/employee also has business transactions with the corporation in a different capacity - such as landlord/tenant, lessor/lesee, etc. then the person drafting the "hemlock clauses" should draft additional clauses in this light.  The agreement between the parties and the Articles, Bylaws and Minutes should provide for the complete recharacterization of the transactions.  In the event the challenge by the IRS results in double taxation as in this example, then the drafter must make an attempt to provide a tax deduction to the entity suffering the double taxation.  In parallel with this drafting one should consider attempting to recharacterize the payments which were disallowed to a transaction which will not produce income to the recipient and not provide a deduction to the payer.  Focusing on the first part of this solution one should attempt to make the recipient responsible for repayment of the income stream and provide a tax deduction to the recipient, of the income stream, for the repayment to the corporation.  As part of this drafting one must consider changing the entire character of the arrangement should the IRS attempt to restructure the arrangement as claimed on the tax returns.  For example, if the corporate deductions for rent were to be disallowed then the agreement could be changed to a loan, the agreement could be changed to a contract for services, the agreement could be voided, or any other tool the person performing the drafting can create that would withstand court scrutiny.

If the IRS should attack the treatment by the shareholder/employee, then similar provisions should be incorporated into the records and documents.

TOP

Cost Killers 

COST KILLERS

  Management Info Sys, Decision Support Systems, Activity Based Management and Costing, Cost Accounting)

 

TOP

Prepare for Your Adviser CPA or Attorney (or inform yourself about this topic)

PREPARE FOR ADVISER
Entrance Interview

Exit Interview

From Banking Records

From Customer Records

From Signed Documents

From Your Other Business, or Financial Records

From Corporation or Organization Records (meetings, etc.)

What to do

 

About the Preparation Procedures

If you have decided this task must be done, the first procedure is to be certain you have all the facts important to this topic.  So that you may know the value, to you personally, of this topic you must have facts of your circumstances.  So that you may comply with applicable rules, you must have all the facts.  Factual research is time consuming and if not performed wisely will be very expensive if not performed properly, and thoroughly.  IF you decide to make this a do-it-yourself project you should seek the advice of a professional qualified in your jurisdiction to assist you with defining important information and then to overview the information you have gathered.

What to gather - an Organizer and Prepare for your CPA, Attorney or Financial Adviser

 Entrance Interview

Gather all your individual and corporation records for all transactions between you and your company.  Omit NOTHING.  Include the following and any other relevant items:

  • Corporate minute book

  • Articles of Incorporation

  • Agreements between the shareholder/employee and the corporation

  • Description of all dealings between the shareholder/employee and the corporation - include dates, amounts, objective of the transaction or event and another relevant information

Exit Interview

Be certain you fully understand your responsibilities and actions.

From Banking Records

Copies of checks, deposits and any requirements the bank has made for you and your company.

From Customer Records

From Signed Documents

From Your Other Business, or Financial Records

From Corporation Records or Organization Records (meetings, etc.) 

What to do

Start of Preparing For You CPA Section

TOP

Prepare Yourself - Become Knowledgeable About Forms, Checklists, Etc.

INFORM YOURSELF
Action Checklist - What To Do

OVERVIEW OF PROCEDURES

How to do this - What to Do:  Seek assistance from Bob Parrish, as requirements change from time to time and circumstance to circumstance.

 

 

Action Checklist - What To Do

OVERVIEW OF PROCEDURES

First set a conference with your CPA and have your CPA perform the factual analyses to identify potential problem areas.   For the Tax Law analyses you can usually depend upon your CPA.  However you will need to assist advice from your legal counsel on the impact of other statutes and common law - and law specific to your jurisdiction.

Back to Start of What To Do  

Back to Start of What To Do  

TOP

Financial Accounting - Bookkeeping and Financial Statements

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
Financial Statement Presentation
Notes to Financial Statements
How to Make Entries
What Kind of Records to Keep
Bookkeeping Methods - Cash, Accrual and Other
How the Business Entity Affects the Recording

Financial Statement Presentation

You will need to be certain the company and personal records are prepared to be in agreement with all the underlying records:

  • Articles of Incorporation

  • Minutes

  • Bylaws

  • Agreements

  • Contracts

  • Checks and Deposits

  • State laws and Acts

  • Federal Tax Law

Although this section is directed to Financial Accounting I shall not cover Generally Accepted Accounting Principles at this time.

Back to Start of Financial Accounting: Bookkeeping & Financials

Notes to Financial Statements

Back to Start of Financial Accounting: Bookkeeping & Financials

How to Make Entries

Back to Start of Financial Accounting: Bookkeeping & Financials

What Kind of Records to Keep

Back to Start of Financial Accounting: Bookkeeping & Financials

Bookkeeping Methods - Cash, Accrual and Other

Back to Start of Financial Accounting: Bookkeeping & Financials

How the Business Entity Affects the Recording

Sole Proprietor

Corporation - C & S

Partnerships - General, Limited, Limited Liability Company, Registered Limited Liability Partnership or Company

Trusts

Tax Exempt

Back to Start of Financial Accounting: Bookkeeping & Financials

TOP

Compliance Requirements

COMPLIANCE

Compliance Checklist

Back to Start of What is required for protection, defense, etc.  

TOP

Alerts and Dangers

ALERTS - DANGERS
Action Checklist
Alerts & Dangers - Risks
Asset Protection
Your Defense

Action Checklist

Back to Start of Alerts & Dangers

Alerts & Dangers - Risks

Back to Start of Alerts & Dangers

Asset Protection

Back to Start of Alerts & Dangers

Your Defense

Back to Start of Alerts & Dangers

Tools - Spreadsheets - Documents - Checklists - Organizers

TOOLS
Spreadsheets & Math

Spreadsheets & Computations 

 

Back to Start of Spreadsheets & Math

TOP

Sample Forms

SAMPLES

Consult with your adviser - call, write, email or drop by to seek the advice of Bob Parrish CPA.  If you are not a current client, then Bob Parrish CPA PC can furnish a second opinion or can be your primary adviser.  This entire site is for educational or informational purposes only.   The materials are not opinions, advise, legal advice on any matter and have not been tailored to specific jurisdictions, individuals, other entities, or circumstances.  You are not to use the forms, concepts, strategies, or knowledge without assistance from a professional.   You must update and validate this information yourself with your own research, experience and the advice of a competent professional adviser in your jurisdiction.  

Back to Start of Contracts, Trusts, etc.  

TOP

Required Reports

REQUIRED REPORTS

 

Back to Start of Reports Required

TOP

Checklist for Deployment

CHECKLIST FOR DEPLOYMENT

Checklists for Deployment  

 

Back to Start of Checklists - Deployment  

Checklist for Monitoring

CHECKLIST FOR MONITORING

   

Back to Start of Checklist - Monitoring

TOP

Index

INDEX

TOP

Click on the text --  (a) to expand or collapse the outline if the text has no underline OR (b) to jump to the topic if the text has an underline

Contact Information

BOB PARRISH CPA, P.C.
Bob Parrish CPA, P.C.

email_me.gif (16374 bytes)  

Bob Parrish
Copyright © 1999,2000,2001  Bob Parrish. All rights reserved.
Revised: March 04, 2007 .

Consulting OnLine © and pro1040 © are the sole property of Bob Parrish.  All rights reserved.