Regarding: Family Limited Partnership
Please Reply To: pro1040@comcast.net, email, USA Mail, Fax, telephone or request a meeting
Texas 915-367-3465
Florida 941-387-0926
Document Transmitted Via: Email
In March 2002, the Internal Revenue Service was successful in challenging a family limited partnership agreement's language based upon the "Present Interest" element of a gift for gift tax purposes. The Court has stated without question which elements must be included and acted upon by the general partner of a family limited partnership, or the managing member of a family limited liability company.
The Court has stated the transferee must receive distributions from the family LP or LLC. Moreover, the transferee must possess "title" in the true and strict sense of "possess". The Court frowned seriously upon any restrictions on the sale or transfer of the interest in the family LP or LLC.
To summarize the Decision in this United States Tax Court Case:
The referenced authorities [Title 26 Subtitle B
Chapter 12 Subchapter A §2503(b)] require a taxpayer claiming an annual
exclusion to establish that the transfer in dispute conferred on the donee
an unrestricted and noncontingent right to the immediate use, possession,
or enjoyment (1) of property or (2) of income from property, both of which
alternatives in turn demand that such immediate use, possession, or
enjoyment be of a nature that substantial economic benefit is derived
therefrom. In other words,
taxpayers and the language of the FLP Agreement must prove from all the
facts and circumstances that in receiving the FLP units, the donees
thereby obtained use, possession, or enjoyment of the units or income from
the units within the above-described meaning of section 2503(b).
Nonetheless,
the simple expedient of paper title does not in and of itself create a
present interest for purposes of section 2503(b) unless all the facts and
circumstances establish that such
possession renders an economic benefit presently reachable by the donees.
The Internal Revenue Service was successful in March
2002 in challenging the language in a
The Internal Revenue Service argued successfully the transfers of the LLC units did not meet the essential elements of the “Present Interest” doctrine. The Internal Revenue Service used the language in the Operating Agreement (as could be done with any Limited Partnership Agreement) to win its case. The Court (obviously) agreed the language in the instrument fell short of conferring on the donees the requisite immediate and unconditional rights to the use, possession or enjoyment of property or the income from property. Lack of freedom to transfer the units, or to compel cash distributions from the entity prevented them from receiving any such benefit because of the transfers. The Internal Revenue Service argued successfully, the gifts postponed any economic benefit and were therefore of future interests.
Bob Parrish CPA PC, for the firm
Bob Parrish CPA
Visit the Bob Parrish CPA PC
ConsultingOnLine Web Site http://www.pro1040.com